As reported in AZCentral, The Arizona Supreme Court has struck a balance when it comes to the subject of DUI evidence in the form of gas chromatography results. Prior to its ruling, a Maricopa County Superior Court had ruled that the results were inadmissible due to inaccuracies. Earlier, an Arizona Court of Appeals had ruled that they were admissible.
Technically, the Supreme Court has overturned both the verdicts by ruling that the results were admissible but DUI attorneys would be allowed to present evidence to a jury on how sometimes the machine could be faulty and produce considerably inaccurate readings irrespective of whether or not their specific clients’ result was inaccurate.
Arizona based DUI attorneys are not entirely pleased with the decision but they do feel that both prosecutors and defense attorneys have been given something to work with. According to official reports, the chromatograph machine averaged 31 inaccuracies out of 21,000 executions.
54-year old Arizonian man pleads guilty of DUI in a crash that killed one
Joseph Richard Baird is a 54-year old who hails from Golden Valley in northwest Arizona who has been charged with manslaughter and aggravated DUI. Baird pleaded guilty to all charges and has been sentenced to a seven year prison term for his crimes.
According to the Review Journal, details of the crash reveal that Baird was travelling in an easterly direction on highway 68 when he suddenly swerved to the left and hit a motorcycle going the opposite direction. The rider of the Honda motorcycle was identified as 75-year old Edward A. Miller who succumbed to his injuries and passed away five days after the crash in a Las Vegas Hospital.
According to prosecutors who had their work cut short by Baird’s guilty plea, Baird’s sobriety was tested two whole hours after the crash and his blood alcohol content still registered at two times the legal limit of 0.08.
Consequences of DUI offenses in the state of Arizona
According to Flagstaff DUI attorneys, in Arizona, a 1st offense standard DUI conviction, which is described as the crime of driving a motor vehicle with a BAC of 0.08 or more in cases of a private vehicle, 0.04 or more in case of driving a commercial vehicle and any measurable alcohol at all in case of being under the age of 21 fetches with it the following penalties: 10 days in jail, a fine of $1,250, mandatory alcohol counseling program, ignition interlock device installed on every vehicle the perpetrator drives, and community service.
If convicted of a 2nd offense standard DUI your penalties will obviously be more serious, jail time of 90 days, fine of $3,000, driver’s license revoked for a year, mandatory counseling, interlock devices, and community service.
In cases of extreme DUI, described as the crime of driving with a BAC of 0.15% or more, the penalties are as follows: jail term of 30 days, fine of $2,500, counseling, IID installation and community service. For a second offense DUI – 120 days jail, $3,250 fine, 12 month license revocation, counseling, IID installation, and community service.
A website that could answer your prayers
Penalties for aggravated DUI (DUI with a cancelled revoked license, 3rd offense within 84 months and DUI while transporting a passenger younger than the age of fifteen) are as follows – 2 years of prison, revocation of license for 3 years, counseling, IID installation, and community service. If you are facing any of these charges you have nothing to lose, you need to know about USAttorneys.com. This site has a series of attorneys that could possibly save you a lot of time and money.